Under Armour Balanced Scorecard
Fully Editable
Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets
Professional Design
Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates
Pre-Built
For Quick And Efficient Use
No Expertise Is Needed
Easy To Follow
This Under Armour Balanced Scorecard Analysis helps you quickly evaluate the company's financial, customer, internal process, and learning-and-growth priorities in one structured format. The page already shows a real preview of the actual analysis, so you can review the content and style before buying. Purchase the full version to get the complete ready-to-use report.
Benefits
In FY2025, Under Armour posted about $5.2 billion in revenue, so channel mix matters a lot. A balanced scorecard helps management compare DTC and wholesale on traffic, sell-through, and profit in one view. It also shows whether the website, brand houses, or partners drive the best returns.
Margin discipline matters at Under Armour because FY2025 gross margin was 47.9%, up 180 bps year over year, while revenue fell 9% to $5.3 billion.
A balanced scorecard can track gross margin, discounting, and freight cost together, so sales growth does not get wiped out by weaker pricing.
That is the point: protect profit, not just units.
Under Armour's FY2025 revenue was about $5.2 billion, so product innovation has to do more than add new items; it has to lift conversion, repeat buys, and returns. A balanced scorecard can track launch sell-through, margin, and return rates to show which products create real demand. That matters because even a 1-point shift in gross margin on billions of sales can move profit fast.
Inventory Control
Under Armour's inventory control matters because apparel and footwear demand can swing fast around seasonal launches, so weeks of supply and sell-through need tight tracking. At FY2025 year-end, inventory was about $1.0 billion, and keeping it lean helps cut markdown risk and protect gross margin. Better inventory turns also sharpen assortment choices, so Company Name can move faster on styles that actually sell.
Brand Health
Brand Health gives Under Armour a way to track awareness, engagement, and athlete affinity alongside FY2025 revenue of $5.2 billion, which fell 9% year over year. That matters because brand signals often move before sales do, so rising reach or repeat engagement can show momentum even while revenue is still soft. In FY2025, that kind of read is especially useful as Under Armour worked through a weaker North America business and a 47.9% gross margin base.
A balanced scorecard helps Under Armour turn FY2025 weakness into action by linking revenue, margin, inventory, and brand health. With revenue at about $5.2 billion, gross margin at 47.9%, and inventory near $1.0 billion, it shows which moves protect profit and which ones add risk.
| FY2025 metric | Value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | Tracks demand |
| Gross margin | 47.9% | Shows pricing power |
| Inventory | $1.0B | Flags markdown risk |
What is included in the product
Drawbacks
Brand metrics lag, so Under Armour's scorecard can look stable even when demand is weakening. In fiscal 2025, revenue fell 9% to about $5.2 billion, showing how the brand issue often appears only after sales soften. That delay makes early fixes harder, because awareness and loyalty shift slowly, not quarter by quarter.
Under Armour reported about $5.2 billion in FY2025 revenue, but its DTC, wholesale, and regional data still sit in separate systems. That fragmentation slows scorecard updates, creates mismatches across channels, and forces manual cleanup before leaders can trust the numbers. When a brand this size is tracking thousands of SKUs and global sales flows, even small data gaps can distort margin, inventory, and growth views.
Under Armour reported FY2025 revenue of $5.1 billion, yet a balanced scorecard can still get crowded with traffic, margin, sell-through, and engagement KPIs.
When too many metrics sit side by side, teams can chase the numbers instead of the goal, and accountability gets blurry.
For a company this size, even a 1-point shift in gross margin matters more than a long KPI list.
Short-Term Bias
In fiscal 2025, Under Armour still faced pressure to defend about $5.2 billion in revenue, so a monthly or quarterly target focus can pull leaders toward quick fixes instead of product work. That is a problem because innovation and launch timing drive brand heat, margin, and sell-through. If management trims R&D or delays longer bets to hit near-term numbers, the pipeline weakens and future sales can suffer. Short-term bias can make the scorecard look better now, but it can hurt the brand later.
Regional Noise
Under Armour's FY2025 revenue fell about 9% to roughly $5.2 billion, but that top line can hide region-by-region noise. A stronger U.S. channel mix or a weaker euro and pound can make global results look cleaner than local demand really is. One scorecard can miss a soft Europe or APAC market and make the gap look smaller than it is.
Under Armour's scorecard can still miss damage until revenue weakens, and FY2025 showed that gap clearly: sales fell 9% to about $5.2 billion. Channel and regional data are split across systems, so leaders can see mixed signals on margin, inventory, and demand. Too many KPIs also blur accountability, and short-term targets can crowd out product investment.
| FY2025 drawback | Data point |
|---|---|
| Late brand signal | Revenue down 9% to ~$5.2B |
| Data fragmentation | DTC, wholesale, regions split |
| KPI overload | Traffic, margin, sell-through, engagement |
What You See Is What You Get
Under Armour Reference Sources
This is the actual Under Armour Balanced Scorecard analysis document you'll receive after purchase – no surprises, just the full professional version. The preview you see here is taken directly from the final file, so what you review now is exactly what you'll download. Purchase unlocks the complete detailed report in full.
Frequently Asked Questions
It helps Under Armour connect strategy to execution across 4 perspectives. A practical scorecard can link DTC sales, wholesale sell-through, gross margin, inventory turns, and brand engagement. That is useful because the company sells through 2 main routes and depends on product launches to convert traffic into repeat purchases.
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site - including articles or product references - constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.